 |












|
 |

In
re SONY BMG CD
Technologies Litigation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
No 1:05-ev-09575 (NRB)
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement is made by and among
individual and representative Plaintiffs Edwin Bonner, Ori Edelstein,
Joseph Halpin, Robert Hull, Andrew Klewan, John Maletta, James
Michaelson, Jeffrey Potter, Torn Ricciuti, Yvonne Ricciuti, Dora Rivas,
Mary Schumacher and James Springer ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of
themselves and, on the terms set forth herein, the Settlement Class as
defined herein, and SONY BMG Music Entertainment ("SONY BMG"), a
Delaware general partnership; First 4 Internet Ltd. ("F4I,") a
corporation located in and organized under the laws of the United
Kingdom; SunnComm International Inc., a Nevada corporation
headquartered in Arizona (SunnComm International Inc. and MediaMax
Technology Corp., a Nevada corporation headquartered in Arizona, being
collectively referred to herein as "SunnComm"; SunnComm, F4I and SONY
BMG being collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"; and
Plaintiffs and Defendants being collectively referred to herein as the
"Parties), by and through their respective counsel and representatives,
as of the 28th day of December 2005, to settle and compromise the
claims of Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class on the terms and
conditions set forth below:
I.
CLAIMS OF THE PARTIES
A. SONY BMG markets and,
directly and indirectly, including through retailers, sells, among
other things, compact discs ("CDs") containing music from a wide
variety of genres. During the period beginning on August 1, 2003
through the present, some, but not all, of the CD titles marketed and
sold by SONY BMG, contained, in addition to tracks of music, software
(referred to herein as "Content Protection Software") that, when the
CDs were inserted into computers with CD player/recorder drives, enable
consumers to transfer the music to their computers, from which
consumers could make specified authorized uses (including transferring
the music to portable devices and copying the music on no more than
three (3) blank CDs).
B. SONY BMG used two types
of Content Protection Software on CDs during the Class Period,
"MediaMax" and "XCP." Two versions of "MediaMax" - MediaMax 3.0 and
MediaMax 5.0 - were designed and licensed to SONY BMG by SunnComm. The
MediaMax 3.0 and MediaMax 5.0 software included on SONY BMG CDs sold to
consumers during the Class Period will be referred to as the "MediaMax
Software," and a SONY BMG CD or copy thereof containing such MediaMax
Software will be referred to herein as a "MediaMax CD." Various
versions of "XCP" were designed and licensed to SONY BMG by F4I. The
XCP versions included on SONY BMG CDs sold to consumers during the
Class Period will be referred to herein as the "XCP Software," and a
SONY BMG CD or copy thereof containing XCP Software will be referred to
herein as an "XCP CD." Lists of the CDs containing MediaMax 3.0,
MediaMax 5.0 and XCP are attached as Exhibit A to this Settlement
Agreement.
C. Six complaints - Maletta v. Sony BMG
Music Entm't, No. 05 CV 10637 (UA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2005); Ricciuti
v. Sony BMG Music Entm't, No. 05 CV 10190 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5,
2005); Klewan v. Arista Holdings Inc. d/b/a Sony BMG Music Entm't, No.
05 CV 9609, consolidated as No. 05 CV 9575 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14,
2005); Michaelson v. Sony BMG Music, Inc., No. 05 CV 9575 (NRB)
(S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2005); Potter v. Sony BMG Music Entm't, No. 05 CV
9607, consolidated as No. 05 CV 9575 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2005);
Rivas v. Sony BMG Music Entm't, No. 05 CV 9598, consolidated as No. 05
CV 9575 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2005) - were filed in the Southern
District of New York and are subject to consolidation before the
Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald as the above-referenced SONY BMG CD
Technologies Litigation (the "Action"). A Consolidated Amended
Complaint in the Action (hereafter, the "Complaint") will be filed
before or concurrently with the filing of a motion for preliminary
approval of this Settlement Agreement.
D. Additionally, as of the
date of this Settlement Agreement, other complaints raising
substantially identical claims (collectively, the "Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions") have been filed in jurisdictions other than the Southern
District of New York, including as follows: Black v. Sony BMG Music
Entm't, No. CIV-05-1315 WDS/RLP (D. N.M. Dec. 19, 2005); Klemm v. Sony
BMG Music Entm't, No. C 05 5111 BZ (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2005); Melcon v.
Sony BMG Music Entm't, No. C 05 5084 MI-IP (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2005);
Ponting v. SONYBMG Music Entm't, LLC, No. CV-05-08472-JFW(AJWx) (C.D.
Cal. Dec. 2, 2005); Jacoby v. Sony BMG Music Entm't, No. 051116679
(N.Y. Sup. Ct. Nov. 30, 2005); Bahnmaier v. Sony BMG Music Entm 't, No.
CJ 2005 06968 (Okla. Dist. Ct. Nov. 28, 2005); Xanthakos v. Sony BMG
Music Entnt't, LLC, No. 05-0009203 (D.C. Super. Ct. Nov. 28, 2005);
Maletta v. Sony BMG Music Entm 't Corp., No. BC343615 (Cal. Super. Ct.
Nov. 28, 2005); Burke v. Sony BMG Music Elvin 't, No. 857213 (Cal.
Super. Ct. Nov. 22, 2005); Hull v. Sony BMG Music Entm 't, No. BC343385
(Cal. Super. Ct. Nov. 21, 2005); Cooke v. Sony BMG Music Entm't, No.
05-0009093 (D.C. Super. Ct. Nov. 18, 2005); DeMarco v. Sony BMG Music,
No. 2:05-cv-05485-WHW-SDW (D.N.J. Nov. 17, 2005); Stynchula v. Sony
Corp. of Am, No. BC343100 (Cal. Super. Ct. Nov. 15, 2005); Gruber v.
Sony Corp. of Am., No. BC342805 (Cal. Super. Ct. Nov. 9, 2005); Guevara
v. Sony BMG Music Entm 't, No. BC342359 (Cal. Super. Ct. Nov. 1, 2005).
Although several of the complaints in the Action and the Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions misidentify the proper corporate entity or the name of the
defendant, it is understood that SONY BMG is the defendant meant to
have been named in each such complaint.
E. The Complaint and the complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions allege that, when and if an XCP CD is inserted into a computer,
an End User License Agreement (a "EULA", and, with respect to XCP CDs,
the "XCP EULA") appears automatically on the screen and the XCP
Software installs itself on the user's computer. The Complaint and the
complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions assert that the XCP Software
contains a potentially harmful "rootkit" which renders the user's
computer more vulnerable to "malware" promulgated by third parties,
including "viruses," "Trojan Horses" and "spyware," than the computers
would have been had the XCP Software not been installed. Plaintiffs
also allege that the XCP Software interferes with the user's ability to
access the music via non-XCP Software, consumes excess computer
resources and causes system errors. According to Plaintiffs, SONY BMG
also uses the XCP Software to collect and store information over the
Internet from CD users, including Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses.
F. The Complaint and the
complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions also allege that SONY BMG,
including through the XCP EULA, misrepresented, or did not fully or
adequately disclose, the true nature of the XCP Software, and that the
XCP EULA contained terms that are unconscionable or otherwise
unenforceable. Plaintiffs further allege that, once installed, the XCP
Software is difficult to locate and remove, and that SONY BMG did not
make available a ready means to uninstall the XCP Software. Plaintiffs
allege that when SONY BMG made an uninstaller program available to
remove the XCP Software, this program also created a security risk.
G. The Complaint and the
complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions further claim that when a
MediaMax CD is inserted into a computer, a EULA appears automatically
on the screen (for CDs containing MediaMax 3.0, the "MediaMax 3.0
EULA"; for CDs containing MediaMax 5.0, the "MediaMax 5.0 EULA"; each,
a "MediaMax EULA", and collectively, the "MediaMax EULAs"), and that
certain software files are immediately loaded onto the computer even
before the user of the MediaMax CD has an opportunity to accept or
reject a MediaMax EULA. Plaintiffs allege that the MediaMax Software
remains on the computer even if the MediaMax EULA is rejected, and
further allege that SONY BMG uses the MediaMax Software to collect and
store information over the Internet from CD users, including IP
addresses.
H. The Complaint and the
complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions also allege that SONY BMG,
including through the MediaMax EULAs, misrepresented, or did not fully
or adequately disclose, the true nature of the MediaMax Software, and
that the MediaMax EULAs contained terms that are unconscionable or
otherwise unenforceable. Plaintiffs also allege that MediaMax 5.0
causes a file folder to be installed on a user's computer that renders
the user's computer more vulnerable to security breaches by third
parties by allowing these third parties to gain enhanced permissions
over the user's computer running the Windows operating system.
Plaintiffs further allege that SONY BMG did not make available a ready
means to uninstall the MediaMax Software. Plaintiffs allege that when
SONY BMG made a program available to uninstall the MediaMax Software,
this program also created a security risk.
I. The Complaint and the
complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions claim that SONY BMG and F4I, by
disseminating the XCP Software on XCP CDs, and that SONY BMG and
SunnComm, by disseminating the MediaMax Software on MediaMax CDs,
violated, among other things, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
("CFAA"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030, et seq.; the consumer
fraud, false advertising, and/or deceptive trade practices laws of the
several states, and state and federal common law. The Complaint seeks
injunctive relief, equitable relief, restitution, and damages on behalf
of a nationwide class of consumers who used any of the MediaMax CDs
and/or the XCP CDs. The plaintiffs in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions seek
essentially the same relief on behalf of a nationwide class or the
residents of individual states.
J. Plaintiffs, through their counsel,
have conducted an investigation of the facts and analyzed the relevant
legal issues. Although Plaintiffs and their counsel believe that the
claims asserted in the Complaint have substantial merit, they also have
examined the benefits to be obtained under the proposed Settlement,
including the prompt removal of XCP CDs from the market, and patches
and uninstallers for the MediaMax Software and in the disclosures
regarding MediaMax Software, and have considered the risks, costs and
delays associated with the continued prosecution of this litigation and
the likely appeals of any rulings in favor of either Plaintiffs or
Defendants.
K. Defendants have conducted an
investigation of the facts and analyzed the relevant legal issues.
Defendants deny all liability with respect to any and all facts or
claims alleged in the Complaint and the complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions, and believe that their defenses, including but not limited to,
lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of personal service, and all other
defenses available at law or equity to the claims asserted in the
Complaint and the complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions, have
substantial merit. Defendants also have weighed the potential risks,
costs and delays associated with continued litigation of the Action
against the benefits of the proposed Settlement.
L. Each of the Parties and
counsel believes, in consideration of all the circumstances and after
substantial arms' length settlement negotiations between counsel, that
its interests are best served by entering into the proposed Settlement
set forth in this Settlement Agreement, and that this proposed
Settlement is fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of
the Settlement Class.
M. The Parties also acknowledge that SONY
BMG is subject to one lawsuit brought by the Attorney General of the
State of Texas (Texas v. SONY BMG Music Entertainment, Dist. Ct.,
Travis Co, Tex.), an inquiry by the Federal Trade Commission, and
numerous investigations by state attorneys general and other
governmental authorities in various jurisdictions (together, the
"Government Inquiries," however, the term "Government Inquiries"
expressly excludes actions brought by private citizens of any
jurisdiction under a private attorney general statute). The Government
Inquiries cover materially the same subject matter as the Complaint and
the complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions. It is the intention of SONY
BMG to seek, to the maximum extent possible, to resolve the Government
Inquiries on an agreed basis, with settlement term(s) to be disclosed
to Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, the Court and the public. It is the
intention of the Parties that the teens of this Settlement Agreement be
complementary to the terms of the anticipated settlement(s) of the
Government Inquiries, particularly with respect to injunctive relief.
N. The Parties intend that
the proposed Settlement embodied in this Settlement Agreement will
resolve all Released Claims (as defined below).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the
Parties, that:
(a) the Action be
settled and compromised as between Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves
and all Settlement Class Members and the Defendants, subject to
approval of the Court after a hearing (or hearings) as provided for in
this Settlement Agreement; and
(b) upon Court approval of the settlement
and compromise of the Action, a Final Order and Judgment, substantially
in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit B (the "Judgment") be entered:
(1) dismissing the Action with prejudice; and (2) barring and enjoining
the prosecution by Settlement Class Members of all Released Claims, as
defined below, against the Defendants with prejudice.
(c)
All of the foregoing shall be subject to the following terms and
conditions:
II.
DEFINITIONS
In addition to the foregoing defined terms, for purposes
of the Settlement Agreement and all Exhibits thereto, the following
terms shall have the meanings given to them below:
A. "Class Period" means
the period from August 1, 2003 through the Effective Date.
B. The "Effective Date" is
the date on which the Judgment becomes Final.
C. "Final" means, when
used in connection with any court order or judgment, that the relevant
order or judgment will be final:
a)
if no appeal is taken therefrom, on the date on which the time to
appeal therefrom (including any potential extension of time) has
expired; or
b)
if any appeal is taken therefrom, on the date on which all appeals
therefrom, including petitions for rehearing or reargument, petitions
for rehearing en bane, and petitions for certiorari or any other form
of review, have been finally disposed of, such that the time to appeal
therefrom (including any potential extension of time) has expired, in a
manner resulting in an affirmance of the relevant order or judgment.
D.
The "Injunctive Period" is the period
between one day after the Preliminary Approval Date and December 31,
2007.
E. "Security
Vulnerability" means a weakness in a system, which may result from bugs
or design flaws, allowing an attacker to violate the integrity,
confidentiality, access control, availability, consistency or audit
mechanism of the system or the data and applications it hosts. For
purposes of illustration, Security Vulnerabilities are of significant
interest when the program containing the Security Vulnerabilities
operates with special privileges, performs authentication, or provides
easy access to user data or facilities.
F. "Confirmed
Security Vulnerability" means a Security Vulnerability associated with
installation or use of Content Protection Software, or an update or
patch thereto, that, after the Effective Date, is confirmed by an
independent, qualified expert (the "Security Expert") selected by SONY
BMG, such as (without limitation) Next Generation Security Software
Ltd. or Cloakware, Inc., to be a Security Vulnerability that poses a
significant threat to the security of a system.
G. "Suspected
Security Vulnerability" means a replicable Security Vulnerability
associated with installation or use of Content Protection Software,
other than the XCP Software, XCP Update, XP Uninstaller or an update or
patch thereto, that, after the Effective Date, has been found by the
SONY BMG personnel responsible for Content Protection Software, or
identified and described to such personnel by a reputable computer
security firm, consultant, or other person with expertise in computer
security.
H. "Personal Data" means
information stored on a computer that itself discloses the identity of
the individual using that computer or websites, other than the SONY BMG
and SunnComm websites, that the user has visited using the browser on
such computer, but does not include the IP address of the computer's
Internet connection or any information with respect to an album title,
artists and tracks, or other non-personally identifiable information,
that is routinely logged by SONY BMG in connection with enhanced or
connected CDs.
I. "Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel" means the firms of Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP
and Kamber & Associates, LLC. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel may, at
their sole option, delegate certain responsibilities under this
Settlement Agreement, including, without limitation, those
responsibilities described in Sections 11I.1-M, III.Q, IV.B(3)(e) and
IV.B(4).
J. The "Preliminary Approval Date" is the date one
business day after the Court grants preliminary approval to this
Settlement Agreement and directs the Defendants to send notice to
Settlement Class Members on the terms specified herein.
K. "Released Parties" means each and all of the
Defendants and each and all of Defendants' direct and indirect parent
companies including, in the case of SONY BMG and without limitation,
Sony Corporation and Bertelsmann AG, and each and all of each of Sony
Corporation's, Bertelsmann AG's and Defendants' respective divisions
and direct and indirect subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, joint
ventures, predecessors and successor corporations and business
entities, and each and all of their past and present officers,
directors, servants, licensees, joint ventures, sureties, attorneys,
agents, consultants, advisors, contractors, employees, controlling or
principal shareholders, general or limited partners or partnerships,
divisions, insurers, designated management companies, and each and all
of their successors or predecessors in interest, assigns, or legal
representatives, and any persons or entities that have designed,
developed, programmed, manufactured, supplied, advertised, marketed,
distributed or sold MediaMax CDs and/or XCP CDs or software thereon.
L. "Settlement Agreement"
refers to this Settlement Agreement and "Settlement" refers to the
terms of the settlement described herein.
M. "Settlement Class"
means the named Plaintiffs in the Action and all natural persons or
entities in the United States who purchased, received, came into
possession of or otherwise used one or more MediaMax CDs and/or XCP CDs
from August 1, 2003 through the Effective Date, SONY BMG shall provide
to Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, prior to the Fairness Hearing, an
affidavit or other confirmatory discovery verifying that no MediaMax
CDs or XCP CDs were sold or issued in the United States prior to August
1, 2003 and the total number of MediaMax CDs and XCP CDs manufactured
and sold as of the date of Fairness Hearing. Excluded from the
Settlement Class are Released Parties; SONY BMG-authorized resellers or
distributors of the XCP CDs and MediaMax CDs; current or former
employees of Released Parties; and any persons or entities that have
previously executed releases discharging any or all of the Defendants
from liability concerning or encompassing any or all claims that are
the subject of the Complaint and the complaints in the Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions.
N. "Settlement Class
Member" means any person who falls within the definition of the
Settlement Class and who does not validly and timely elect exclusion
from the Settlement Class under the conditions and procedures for
exclusion as determined by the Court and described in any Notice of
Pendency and Settlement of Class Action approved by the Court.
O. "Released Claims" means
any and all claims, rights, damages, losses, demands, obligations,
actions, causes of action, suits, cross-claims, matters, issues, debts,
liens, contracts, liabilities, agreements, costs, or expenses, of any
nature whatsoever, ascertained or unascertained, suspected or
unsuspected, existing or claimed to exist, including Unknown Claims, of
any and all Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members arising out of
any purchase or use by them of an XCP CD or a MediaMax CD, the XCP
Update (as defined below), the XCP Uninstaller (as defined below), the
MediaMax Update (as defined below), or the MediaMax Uninstaller (as
defined below) or any installation or de-installation of XCP Software
or MediaMax Software at any time, to the extent that such claims: (a)
arise out of the Action or the Non-S.D.N.Y, Actions; (b) relate to any
allegations that either were or could have been asserted in the Action
or the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions; or (c) which might in the future be
asserted by any Plaintiff or Settlement Class Member, against any of
the Released Parties that would arise out of, or relate to in any
manner, directly or indirectly, any acts, facts, transactions,
occurrences, conduct, representations or omissions alleged in the
Action and the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions, including, without limitation,
claims respecting any disclosure, advertising or other descriptions of,
or claims relating to (i) the nature, quality, value, and/or
functionality of the MediaMax CDs, the XCP CDs, the MediaMax Software,
MediaMax Update, MediaMax Uninstaller, XCP Software, XCP Update or XCP
Uninstaller; and/or (ii) the EULAs, and/or (iii) the alleged collection
by Defendants of Personal Data or IPA addresses. Released Claims also
include claims for abuse of process, malicious prosecution or any other
claim arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the defense or
resolution of the Action. For avoidance of doubt, Released Claims
include claims relating to (i) the asserted costs of removing XCP
Software and/or MediaMax Software from a computer or network and (ii)
damages caused by negligent removal of XCP Software and/or MediaMax
Software. The sole exception to the definition of Released Claims is
that such claims do not include claims for consequential damage to a
computer or network that may or are alleged to have resulted from
interactions between the XCP Software or the MediaMax Software and
other software or hardware installed on such computer or network. (For
avoidance of doubt, Released Claims also do not include copyright,
trademark or other claims concerning the ownership of intellectual
property rights in the MediaMax Software or the XCP Software, or any
Uninstaller or updates thereto, which were not alleged)
P. "Unknown Claims" means all claims arising out of
facts relating to any matter covered by the Released Claims which all
persons or entities providing releases under this Settlement Agreement,
including all Settlement Class Members, do not know or suspect to exist
in their favor at the time of the release of the Released Parties and
which, if known by them, might have affected their decision to settle
with Defendants and release the Released Parties or to take any other
action including, but not limited to, objecting or not objecting to the
Settlement. All persons or entities providing releases under this
Settlement Agreement may hereafter discover facts other than or
different from those which such persons now know or believe to be true
with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims. Upon the
Effective Date, each person or entity providing releases under this
Settlement Agreement, including all Settlement Class Members, shall be
deemed to have waived any and all rights that he, she, it or they may
have under any statute, regulation, administrative adjudication or
common law principle that would otherwise limit the effect of the
foregoing releases to those claims actually known or suspected to exist
at the time of execution of this Settlement Agreement, including, but
not limited to, the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil
Code, to the extent deemed applicable, which provides as follows:
1542. "General Release-Claims Extinguished. A general release does not
extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist
in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by
him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor."
III. TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS
A. In exchange for the
dismissal of the Action and for entry of the Judgment as provided for
in this Settlement Agreement, on the Preliminary Approval Date, SONY
BMG shall make available to Settlement Class Members the benefits in
this Section III (the "Settlement Benefits"), in accordance with the
procedures set forth below.
B. XCP Exchange Program.
1.
After some of the complaints had been
filed, but before the Parties began negotiating this Settlement
Agreement, SONY BMG had offered all persons possessing any XCP CD the
opportunity to exchange such XCP CD for an identical CD title that does
not contain any Content Protection Software. SONY BMG also has offered
any such person the opportunity to download non-content protected MP3
versions of the music contained on any such XCP CD that he or she is
exchanging. Those offers are hereby incorporated into this Settlement
Agreement as terms of the Settlement and are subject to the terms and
conditions of this Settlement Agreement.
2.
In addition to the exchange described in
Section III.B.1, SONY BMG also shall offer the additional incentives
specified below in Section C (the "Incentives") to induce Settlement
Class Members to exchange their XCP CDs for CDs that do not contain
Content Protection Software.
3.
SONY BMG will use commercially
reasonable efforts to advise its authorized resellers that SONY BMG
will accept returns from that reseller of XCP CDs in any condition, and
SONY BMG will provide full refunds to the reseller for those returned
XCP CDs. Although SONY BMG cannot compel its resellers to accept such
returns from consumers, or dictate the consideration (i.e., refunds,
store credit or exchanges) that its resellers will offer upon the
return of XCP CDs, SONY BMG will use commercially reasonable efforts to
encourage resellers to provide at least an even exchange of that XCP
CD, and to provide a receipt for the exchange so that Settlement Class
Members may readily claim the Incentives by sending the receipt to SONY
BMG.
4.
If a Settlement Class Member returns an
XCP CD to a reseller, and wishes to claim the Incentives, he or she may
do so by filling out a Claim Form, and by sending that Claim Form and
the exchange receipt by mail or electronic mail to the address
specified on the Claim Form.
5.
SONY BMG also will offer Settlement
Class Members the option of returning their XCP CDs to SONY BMG by U.S.
Mail, or another shipping method, at no charge to the Settlement Class
Member. SONY BMG may administer this exchange program itself or it may,
at its option, engage a vendor of its choosing to administer the
exchange program.
6.
If a Settlement Class Member returns an
XCP CD to SONY BMG using the procedure specified above in Section
III.B(5), that Settlement Class Member may claim the Incentives by
completing the Claim Form.
C. Settlement Class Members who exchange
XCP CDs purchased before February 1, 2006 shall be entitled, by
submitting the Claim Form, to claim either of the following Incentives
from SONY BMG:
1.
Incentive #1. For each XCP CD returned by a Settlement Class Member,
the Settlement Class Member may elect to receive a cash payment of
seven dollars and fifty cents ($7.50), payable (at SONY BMG's sole
option) by check or debit card, and a promotional code allowing the
holder of the code to download the contents of any one (1) of the
albums specified on the list attached hereto as Exhibit
C.2.
Incentive #2. For each XCP CD returned by a Settlement Class Member,
the Settlement Class Member may elect to receive a promotional code
allowing the holder of the code to download the contents of any three
(3) of the albums specified on the list attached hereto as Exhibit C.
3. For both Incentive #1 and Incentive
#2, Settlement Class Members will be able to select promotional codes
usable to download the specified album contents from any one of three
(3) major download services. SONY BMG will use commercially reasonable
efforts to ensure that one of the three download services offered as an
option to Settlement Class Members is the "iTunes" service. The
promotional codes will be fully transferable, and will expire no less
than 180 days after they are issued.
D. To claim entitlement to
the
Incentives, a Settlement Class Member
shall (i) return one or more XCP CDs to SONY BMG, or provide SONY BMG
with a receipt indicating the return or exchange of an XCP CD at the
place of purchase after November 14, 2005; and (ii) complete an on-line
or hard-copy Claim Form, which shall include an affirmance that, if the
Settlement Class Member has installed the XCP Software, he or she has
run the XCP Uninstaller or the XCP Update. If a Settlement Class Member
who returns the XCP CD to the place of purchase elects to send the
Claim Form by any means other than electronic mail, the Settlement
Class Member shall be responsible for the costs of postage for that
Claim Form.
E. MediaMax 3.0
Compensation. A Settlement Class Member who purchased one or more
MediaMax CDs containing MediaMax 3.0 before December 31, 2006, and who
provides proof of such purchase under the terms specified below in
Section III.H., will be entitled to receive, for each such CD
purchased, the opportunity to download non-content protected MP3
versions of the music contained on such MediaMax 3.0 CD.
F. MediaMax 5.0
Compensation. A
Settlement Class Member who purchased one or more MediaMax CDs
containing MediaMax 5.0 before December 31, 2006, and who provides
proof of such purchase under the terms specified below in Section
III.H., will be entitled to receive, for each such CD purchased, (i)
the opportunity to download non-content protected MP3 versions of the
music contained on such MediaMax 5.0 CD; and (ii) a transferable
promotional code allowing the holder of the code to download, from any
one of the three (3) major download services referred to in Section
III.C.3, the contents of any one (1) of the albums specified on the
list attached hereto as Exhibit C. The promotional code described in
clause (ii), above, will expire no less than 180 days after it is
issued.
G. The benefits to
MediaMax CD purchasers
described above in paragraphs III.E. and III.F. shall be referred to
collectively herein as the "MediaMax Compensation,"
H. To claim entitlement to
the MediaMax
Compensation, a Settlement Class Member shall complete the on-line or
hard-copy Claim Form, which shall include an affirmance that, if the
Settlement Class Member installed the MediaMax Software, he or she has
run the MediaMax Update or the MediaMax Uninstaller, and submit with
the Claim Form one of the following proofs of purchase for each
MediaMax CD for which compensation is sought: (i) the original UPC
code, cut out from the
cover artwork of the MediaMax CD; (ii) a purchase receipt (including
but not limited to an electronic purchase confirmation from any on-line
retailer), credit card or bank statement reflecting the purchase, or
cancelled check reflecting the purchase, or (iii) the MediaMax CD
itself (in which case, SONY BMG will not be required to return the
MediaMax CD to the Settlement Class Member). If the Settlement Class
Member sends the Claim Form and requisite proof of purchase specified
in clause (ii), above, by means other than electronic mail, the
Settlement Class Member shall be responsible for the costs of postage
or shipment for that Claim Form and proof of purchase. The proof of
purchase specified in clauses (i) and (iii), above, must be sent by
U.S. Mail or other method of shipment, and the Settlement Class Member
shall be responsible for the costs of postage or shipment for the Claim
Form and proof of purchase.
I. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel shall have the right to
periodically
monitor the XCP Exchange Program and ensure that SONY BMG is (itself or
through the vendor it selects) providing the appropriate replacement
CDs (under Section II.B(1)), Incentives and MediaMax Compensation to
Settlement Class Members within a reasonable time after receiving such
claims. Additionally, on the later of December 31, 2006 or the
Effective Date, SONY BMG will provide to Plaintiffs' Class Counsel
information about the total number of Settlement Class Members who (i)
downloaded the XCP Update, XCP Uninstaller, MediaMax Update and
MediaMax Uninstaller, and (ii) submitted claims for the Incentives
and/or MediaMax Compensation. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel shall treat
this information as Confidential under the terms of an appropriate
Confidentiality Stipulation to be negotiated prior to the commencement
of confirmatory discovery.
J. XCP Update. SONY BMG commits to continue making
available, through
its Internet website, a software utility (the "XCP Update"),
downloadable by Settlement Class Members, that will remove the cloaking
portion of the XCP Software that hid or "cloaked" filenames, including
directories or registry keys with the prefix of Ssys$, so that the XCP
Software's Content Protection Software is visible to users through an
ordinary directory search. Settlement Class Members will not need to
provide Defendants with any Personal Data in order to obtain the XCP
Update. The XCP Update also will offer Settlement Class Members the
opportunity to completely remove the XCP Software from their computer
or network. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel has had and will have an
opportunity to review and comment on all instructions provided to
Settlement Class Members on how to use the XCP Update. SONY BMG shall
verify, subject to confirmatory discovery by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel,
that it has obtained the opinion of an independent, qualified expert
that the XCP Update is effective, and that installation of the XCP
Update would create no known Security Vulnerabilities that would be
considered Confirmed Security Vulnerabilities.
K. XCP Uninstaller. SONY BMG commits to continue making
available,
through its Internet website, a software utility (the "XCP
Uninstaller"), downloadable by Settlement Class Members, that will
remove the installed XCP Software from the hard disk drive of a
Settlement Class Member's computer. Settlement Class Members will not
need to provide Defendants with any Personal Data in order to obtain
the XCP Uninstaller. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel will have an
opportunity to review and
comment on all instructions provided to Settlement Class Members on how
to use the XCP Uninstaller. SONY BMG shall verify, subject to
confirmatory discovery by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, that it has
obtained the opinion of an independent, qualified expert that the XCP
Uninstaller is effective, and that use of the XCP Uninstaller would
create no known Security Vulnerabilities that would be considered
Confirmed Security Vulnerabilities.
L. MediaMax Update. SONY
BMG commits to
continue making available, through its Internet website and SunnComm's
website, software utilities (collectively, the "MediaMax Update"),
downloadable by Settlement Class Members, that eliminate all
currently-known Security Vulnerabilities associated with the MediaMax
Software that would be Confirmed Security Vulnerabilities
post-Effective Date. Settlement Class Members will not need to provide
any Personal Data in order to obtain the MediaMax Update. Plaintiffs'
Class Counsel will have an opportunity to review and comment on all
instructions provided to Settlement Class Members on how to use the
MediaMax Update. SONY BMG shall verify, subject to confirmatory
discovery by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, that it has obtained the
opinion of an independent, qualified expert that the MediaMax Update is
effective, and that installation of the MediaMax Update would create no
known Security Vulnerabilities that would be considered Confirmed
Security Vulnerabilities.
M. MediaMax Uninstaller.
SONY BMG commits
to continue making available, through its website, a software utility
(the "MediaMax Uninstaller") available through SunnComm's website,
downloadable by Settlement Class Members, that will remove the MediaMax
Software from the hard disk drive of a Settlement Class Member's
computer. Settlement Class Members will not need to provide any
Personal Data in order to obtain the MediaMax Uninstaller. Plaintiffs'
Class Counsel has had and will have an opportunity to review and
comment on all instructions provided to Settlement Class Members on how
to use the MediaMax Uninstaller. SONY BMG shall verify, subject to
confirmatory discovery by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, that it has
obtained the opinion of an independent, qualified expert that the
MediaMax Uninstaller is effective, and that use of the MediaMax
Uninstaller would create no known Security Vulnerabilities that would
be considered Confirmed Security Vulnerabilities.
N. The XCP Update, the XCP Uninstaller, the MediaMax
Update and the
MediaMax Uninstaller shall be available continuously on or through SONY
BMG's website until December 31, 2007.
0. In the website locations where SONY BMG makes
available the XCP
Update, the XCP Uninstaller, the MediaMax Update and the MediaMax
Uninstaller, SONY BMG also shall provide links to the websites of at
least two providers of antivirus/anti-spyware software, at least one of
which companies provides its software at no charge, and will include
language encouraging users to visit those websites and learn more about
the anti-virus/anti-spyware offerings of such vendors. SONY BMG shall
not, by so doing, incur any liability or responsibility for the
functionality or performance of such vendors' offerings, and may so
state on its website.
P. SONY BMG will begin making the Incentives and the
MediaMax
Compensation available to Settlement Class Members upon the provision
of notice of this Settlement to Settlement Class Members. If the
Effective Date does not occur and/or this Settlement Agreement is
terminated pursuant to its terms, Settlement
Class Members who have received Settlement Benefits prior to such
termination will not have any obligation to return those Settlement
Benefits to SONY BMG.
Q. Between the Preliminary
Approval Date
and the Effective Date, SONY BMG agrees to explore and to discuss with
Plaintiffs' Class Counsel other methods for publicizing and
disseminating the XCP Update, MediaMax Update, XCP Uninstaller and
MediaMax Uninstaller.
R. Defendants agree not to
object if any
operating system manufacturer, provider of computer security or
anti-virus software plans to disseminate the XCP Update, the XCP
Uninstaller, the MediaMax Update or the MediaMax Uninstaller, to such
provider's customers.
S. No Collection of
Personal Data. SONY
BMG asserts that it has not used the MediaMax or XCP Software, or any
of the enhanced content on XCP CDs or MediaMax CDs, to collect,
aggregate or retain Personal Data about persons who listened to XCP CDs
or MediaMax CDs on computers, without such persons' express consent.
SONY BMG further asserts that it only has collected information
necessary to provide enhanced CD functionality. SONY BMG believes and,
on that basis, asserts that such functionality requires that the album
title, artist, IP address, and certain non-personally identifiable
information be collected. Beginning prior to the Fairness Hearing, SONY
BMG will take commercially reasonable steps to destroy the information
it collects to provide enhanced CD functionality, including logs of IP
addresses, within ten (10) days after the collection of such data,
except as required by law, regulation, litigation discovery rule or
court order. SONY BMG shall, however, be permitted to compile
aggregate, non-personally identifiable data about hits to its servers
from enhanced CDs.
T. Third Party Verification. Between the
Preliminary Approval Date and a date to be specified in the Hearing
Order, SONY BMG will cause an independent third party to investigate
whether SONY BMG has collected, aggregated or retained Personal Data or
IP addresses in a manner inconsistent with the above representations.
SONY BMG will provide the third party's conclusions to Plaintiffs'
Class Counsel and to the Court prior to the Fairness Hearing, and shall
post the third party's conclusions on its website. SONY BMG will
similarly engage an independent third party to repeat this review once
during each of calendar years 2006 and 2007. SONY BMG will post the
third party's conclusions on its website no more than thirty (30) days
after receiving those conclusions.
U. Defendants' Waiver of Certain
Provisions Of the XCP EULA and the MediaMax EULAs. As of the Effective
Date, Defendants shall waive all of their rights to enforce the
following provisions of the XCP EULA and the MediaMax 5.0 EULA (which
are identical):
1.
Article 2, to the extent such
provision could be construed as precluding consumers from transferring
music they purchased to media players and portable devices that are not
"APPROVED MEDIA PLAYERS" and "APPROVED PORTABLE DEVICES" (as those
terms are defined in the EULA);
2. Article 2.3;
3. Article 3.1(a), to the extent such
provision could be construed to prevent copying or reproducing the
"DIGITAL CONTENT" otherwise permitted by applicable laws;
4. Article
3.1(b), to the extent such provision could be construed to prevent
resale of the physical CD on which the "DIGITAL CONTENT" is embodied;
5. Article
3.1(e), to the extent such provision could be construed as giving
Defendants an affirmative right to preclude uninstallation of the XCP
Software or MediaMax Software, or other non-negligent efforts to remedy
the Security Vulnerabilities allegedly associated with such software;
6. Article
3.1(f), to the extent anything in such provision is inconsistent with
SONY BMG's waiver of rights under this Paragraph U;
7.
Articles 7 and 8;
8. Article
9(1); and
9. Article
9.2(ii)-(iii). As of the Effective Date, SONY BMG and SunComm also
shall waive all of their rights to enforce the following provisions of
the MediaMax 3.0 EULA:
1.
Paragraph III, to the extent anything in such provision is inconsistent
with SONY BMG's waiver of rights under this Paragraph U;
2. Article
1.1, to the extent such provision could be construed as precluding
consumers from transferring music they purchased to a media player or
portable device that is not a "Digital Content System" (as that term is
defined in the MediaMax 3.0 EULA);
3. Article
1.2;
4. Article
1.3, to the extent such provision could be construed as (i) preventing
copying or reproducing otherwise permitted by applicable laws, (ii)
preventing the resale of the physical CD on which the "Digital Content"
is embodied, or (iii) giving SONY BMG or SunnComm an affirmative right
to preclude uninstallation of the MediaMax software, or other
non-negligent efforts to remedy the Security Vulnerabilities allegedly
associated with such software; and
5. Article
1.4, to the extent such provision could be construed to prevent copying
or reproducing otherwise permitted by applicable laws.
As provided in the Proposed Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit B,
Defendants agree to waive the limitation of liability provisions
(Article 6 of each of the XCP EULA and the MediaMax 5.0 EULA; Article
4.1 of the MediaMax 3.0 EULA), and the New York forum selection clauses
(Article 10 of each of the XCP EULA and the MediaMax 5.0 EULA; Article
6.1 of the MediaMax 3.0 EULA) of the EULAs only in cases where a
Settlement Class Member alleges non-Released Claims on his or her own
behalf only, and not as a putative class action, mass action or private
attorney general proceeding.
V. If, after the date on which this Settlement Agreement
is executed,
SONY BMG enters into any settlement agreement, consent decree,
assurance of discontinuance or other, similar pre-trial resolution in
connection with any of the Government Inquiries, in which SONY BMG
undertakes to provide additional benefits directly to all Settlement
Class Members who reside in any single state or states respecting
Released Claims, SONY BMG agrees to offer the same benefits to all
Settlement Class Members on the same terms. For avoidance of doubt, the
payment of civil or criminal penalties, fines or investigative costs by
Defendants in connection with any of the Government Inquiries would not
constitute the provision of additional benefits directly to Settlement
Class Members under this Section.
IV. AGREEMENT WITH
ATTORNEYS GENERAL
A. The Parties expect that, by the date of the Fairness
Hearing, SONY BMG will have entered into an enforceable, nationwide
agreement resolving one or more of the Government Inquiries. The
Parties also expect that the resolution of these Government Inquiries
will include, at least, the restrictions on SONY BMG's future conduct
stated below in Paragraph IV.B. If, as of the date of the Fairness
Hearing, SONY BMG has not entered into such an enforceable agreement,
and/or if such agreement is not nationwide in scope and does not
address each and every one of the provisions stated in Section IV.B,
then as of the date of the Fairness Hearing, this Settlement Agreement
will be deemed amended to include an entitlement by Settlement Class
Members to an injunction, issued by and enforceable by the Court,
implementing each and every such provision not so addressed.
B. The provisions expected to be covered in an agreement
to
resolve the Government Inquiries, and which will be deemed part of this
Settlement Agreement if no enforceable agreement resolving the
Government Inquiries is reached prior to the Fairness Hearing, are as
follows:
1. SONY BMG will agree not
to manufacture or
distribute audio CDs with XCP Software. (SONY BMG, in fact, has not
been manufacturing or distributing audio CDs with XCP Software since
November 2005.)
2. SONY BMG will agree not
to manufacture
audio CDs with MediaMax 3.0 or MediaMax 5.0. (SONY BMG, in fact, has
not been manufacturing audio CDs with MediaMax 3.0 or MediaMax 5.0
since December 18, 2005.)
3. If SONY BMG
manufactures any CDs with any
Content Protection Software during the Injunctive Period, it will,
before doing so:
a)
Ensure that the Content Protection
Software operates in a manner ensuring that no software will be
installed on the hard disk drive of a user's computer unless and until
the user has agreed to such installation by accepting a EULA or by
otherwise affirmatively consenting to such installation.
b)
Ensure that an uninstaller for such
Content Protection Software is made readily available to consumers,
without their needing to provide personal information, either on the
CD, through a link on the CD's user interface, or by such other
comparable method as is generally used in the software industry.
c)
Ensure that the functionality of any
updates and/or material changes in functionality of the Content
Protection Software is adequately disclosed.
d)
Ensure that any EULA associated with the
Content Protection Software accurately describes the nature and
function of the software, and does so in easily understandable language.
e)
Show any EULA associated with the Content
Protection Software in advance of its use to an independent third party
(the "EULA Reviewer") to be designated jointly by SONY BMG and
Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, and receive comments on the proposed EULA
from the EULA Reviewer. SONY BMG shall consider, but will not be
required to adopt, the comments of the EULA Reviewer. However, to the
extent that SONY BMG determines not to accept the EULA Reviewer's
comments, the EULA Reviewer will not be required to keep such
non-accepted comments confidential.
f)
Provide any Content Protection Software
to at least one qualified, independent third party, and obtain an
opinion from that third party that the installation and use of the
software would create no Security Vulnerabilities that would be
considered Confirmed Security Vulnerabilities.
g)
Ensure that, with respect to CDs with
Content Protection Software, SONY BMG will, if such CDs are played on
computers with active connections to the Internet and the CDs cause the
computer to make a connection to the Internet, make a record only of
the associated album title, artist, IP address from which the
connection was made, and certain non-personally identifiable
information; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not preclude
SONY BMG from obtaining personally-identifiable information from the
user upon consent.
h)
Include, on any SONY BMG CD containing
any Content Protection Software, a written disclosure, in plain
language and type size, and at a location reasonably calculated to
provide appropriate pre-sale notice to consumers, that the CD contains
such Content Protection Software and a brief description of such
Content Protection Software, and, unless such connection is only made
upon the user's prior informed, affirmative consent, that the CD seeks
to connect to a SONY BMG (or a contractor's) server.
4. If,
during the Injunctive
Period, the SONY BMG personnel responsible for Content Protection
Software are made aware of a Suspected Security Vulnerability, either
by virtue of their weekly monitoring of a designated email address or
other designated means of communication, or otherwise, SONY BMG will
take the following steps:
a)
SONY BMG will ensure
that, within no more than five (5) business days after having received
such notice, the circumstances of the Suspected Security Vulnerability
are communicated to the Security Expert for evaluation and testing.
b)
If the Security Expert
determines that the Suspected Security Vulnerability is a Confirmed
Security Vulnerability (which determination will be made as soon as
practicable), within five (5) business days after the vulnerability is
confirmed SONY BMG will, to the extent practicable and where
appropriate, notify at least two major computer security providers
(e.g., Symantec and Microsoft) of the Confirmed Security Vulnerability.
c)
As soon as
practicable, and, in any event, within thirty (30) days after the
determination that there is a Confirmed Security Vulnerability, SONY
BMG will cause to be developed and released (in conjunction with its
vendors and with other experts it may elect, in its sole discretion, to
retain) an update to the Content Protection Software that corrects the
Confirmed Security Vulnerability. The thirty (30)-day period may be
extended for good cause if an update is under development, and SONY BMG
believes that an update will be able to be released within a reasonable
time.
d)
At the time SONY BMG
releases such an update, SONY BMG will, to the extent practicable,
notify at least two major computer security providers (e.g., Symantec
and Microsoft) of the update. The update shall remain continuously
available on or through SONY BMG's website throughout the Injunctive
Period.
e)
At the time SONY BMG
releases such an update, SONY BMG also will so notify Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel.
f)
If, after the period
specified above in subparagraph (c), SONY BMG determines that it cannot
effectively address the Confirmed Security Vulnerability through means
of an update, SONY BMG will so notify Plaintiffs' Class Counsel, and
will meet and confer with Plaintiffs' Class Counsel on an appropriate
course of action. SONY BMG will take such action as it deems
appropriate. If Plaintiffs' Class Counsel does not believe that the
actions taken by SONY BMG are appropriate, it may seek relief from the
Court, pursuant to the Court's continuing jurisdiction over matters
related to this Settlement Agreement.
V. CERTIFICATION OF
SETTLEMENT CLASS
A. For settlement purposes
only, the Parties
will jointly request, as part of the Settlement Notice and Hearing
Order, that the Court make preliminary findings and enter an Order
granting conditional certification of the Settlement Class subject to
final findings and ratification in the Judgment, and appointing
Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' Class Counsel as representatives of the
Settlement Class.
B. Defendants do not consent to
certification of the
Settlement Class for any purpose other than to effectuate the
settlement of the Action. If this Settlement Agreement is terminated
pursuant to its terms, or if the Effective Date for any reason does not
occur, the order certifying the Settlement Class and all preliminary
and/or final findings regarding the Court's provisional class
certification order shall be automatically vacated upon notice to the
Court of the termination of the Settlement Agreement or the failure of
the Effective Date to occur, and the Action shall proceed as though the
Settlement Class had never been certified and such findings had never
been made, without prejudice to the ability of any Party thereafter to
request or oppose class certification on any basis.
VI. ENTRY OF
SETTLEMENT NOTICE AND HEARING ORDER AND NOTICES TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS,
A. Promptly upon execution of the Settlement Agreement
the
Plaintiffs in the Action shall apply to the Court for entry of an
Order, substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit D:
Finding that the requirements for conditional certification of the
Settlement Class have been satisfied, appointing the Plaintiffs and
Plaintiffs' Class Counsel as representatives of the Settlement Class,
and preliminarily approving the Settlement as being within the range of
reasonableness such that notice thereof should be given to members of
the Settlement Class;
2. Approving the Notice of Pendency and
Settlement of
Class Action (the "Full Settlement Notice"), substantially in the form
of Exhibit E annexed hereto, which will contain instructions for
Settlement Class Members to obtain the Settlement Benefits, and a
summary form of that Settlement Notice, substantially in the form of
Exhibit F annexed hereto (the "Summary Settlement Notice"); and
ordering that the Full Settlement Notice and Summary Settlement Notice
be disseminated in the manner set forth below and in the Hearing Order;
3. Providing that all
members of the
Settlement Class who do not, in accordance with the terms of the
Settlement Notice, file valid and timely requests for exclusion from
the Settlement Class be bound by the Judgment dismissing the Action on
the merits and with prejudice;
4.
Finding that the form
and method of notice to be given in accordance with the terms of this
Settlement Agreement and the Hearing Order constitute the best notice
practicable under the circumstances and constitute valid, due and
sufficient notice to the members of the Settlement Class, satisfying
the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
Constitution of the United States, and any other applicable law;
5.
Providing that,
pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be
approved, neither the Plaintiffs nor any member of the Settlement
Class, either directly, representatively or in any other capacity,
shall commence or prosecute any action or proceeding in any court or
tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims against Defendants or any
other of the Released Parties;
6.
Scheduling a hearing
or hearings (collectively, the "Fairness Hearing") to be held by the
Court to consider and determine whether the requirements for
certification of the Settlement Class have been met and whether the
proposed settlement of the Action in accordance with the terms set
forth in this Settlement Agreement, including as part of the Settlement
the payment of Plaintiffs' Class Counsel's attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of Plaintiffs' Class Counsel's expenses, should be
approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, and whether the Judgment
approving the Settlement and dismissing the Action on the merits and
with prejudice against Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members should
be entered;
7. Providing that the Fairness Hearing
may, from time
to time and without further notice to the Settlement Class (except
those Settlement Class Members who file timely and valid objections),
be continued or adjourned by order of the Court;
8. Providing a procedure
for members of the
Settlement Class to request exclusion from the Settlement Class and to
file papers in support of the Settlement with the Court;
9. Establishing December
31, 2006 as the
date by which, if a Settlement Class Member has not sought to receive
one or more of the Settlement Benefits available under this Settlement
Agreement, that Settlement Class Member shall forever be barred from
participating or receiving the Settlement Benefits set forth herein,
but shall in all other respects be subject to the provisions of this
Settlement Agreement, the releases contained in Section VIII, and the
Judgment;
10. Providing that any
objections by any
Settlement Class Member to: (i) the certification of the Settlement
Class and the proposed Settlement, as described in the Full Settlement
Notice, including the provision for payment of Plaintiffs' counsel's
attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses, and/or (ii) entry of the
Judgment, shall be heard and any papers submitted in support of said
objections shall be considered by the Court at the Fairness Hearing
only if, on or before a date (or dates) to be specified in the Hearing
Order, such objector files with the Court a notice of the objector's
intention to appear, submits documentary proof that the objector is a
Settlement Class Member, states in writing the basis for such
objections, and serves copies of the foregoing and all other papers in
support of such objections upon counsel for the Parties identified in
the Full Settlement Notice so that such papers are actually received by
the date set by the Court;
11. Requiring notice to be
provided to the
authorities that are required to be notified of prospective class
action settlements under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, as set
forth in Section X.D; and
12. Establishing a date
(or dates) by which
the Parties shall file and serve all papers in support of the
application for final approval of the Settlement, including the
provision for payment of Plaintiffs' counsel's attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of expenses, and/or in response to any valid and timely
objections received by the designated counsel for the Parties
identified in the Full Settlement Notice.
(collectively, the "Notice") as set forth below, subject to the
approval of the Court:
SONY BMG shall cause the Full Settlement Notice to be sent by
electronic mail, on or before a date to be set forth in the Hearing
Order, to all Settlement Class Members whose email addresses SONY BMG
possesses.
2.
SONY BMG shall post
the Full Settlement Notice on its website. The Full Settlement Notice
will remain posted on that website until December 31, 2006 or until
this Settlement Agreement is terminated by its terms.
3.
When a user inserts
certain XCP CDs and MediaMax CDs into a computer with an active
connection to the Internet, the computer queries SONY BMG's website and
SunnComm's website (for XCP CDs and MediaMax CDs, respectively) for
content, hereafter referred to as the "Banner," specific to the artist
whose work appears on the XCP CD or MediaMax CD. SONY BMG will ensure
that, on or before a date to be set forth in the Hearing Order, the
Banner on MediaMax CDs and XCP CDs so equipped will, in addition to its
regular artist-specific content, display a clear and conspicuous link
to the Full Settlement Notice.
4.
SONY BMG shall work
with (and, if necessary, compensate) Google and other search engine
firms to ensure that a link to the Full Settlement Notice is displayed
prominently when users of those search engines search for words such as
"XCP," "MediaMax" and "SONY BMG Settlement."
5. SONY
BMG shall cause the
Summary Settlement Notice to be published, on or before a date to be
set forth in the Hearing Order in (i) the USA Today newspaper, or
another, similar publication of national circulation; (ii) People
magazine, or another, similar publication of national circulation;
(iii) Rolling Stone and Spin magazines; (iv) the Los Angeles Times, (v)
the New York Daily News; (vi) the New York Post, (vii) the Chicago
Tribune and (viii) the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. With respect to
the daily publications listed above, the advertisements containing the
Summary Settlement Notice shall be published on any single Monday,
Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, and shall not be required to be more
than an eighth-page in size.
6.
Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel may continuously post the Summary Settlement Notice and the
Full Settlement Notice on their firm websites, beginning two (2)
business days prior to the date set forth in the Hearing Order for
transmission of the Full Settlement Notice and publication of the
Summary Settlement Notice, and ending on December 31, 2006. Plaintiffs'
Class
Counsel will, additionally, cause the joint press release described
below in Section XI.F, which will contain the information included in
the Summary Settlement Notice, to be issued over PR Newswire, or
another similar national business wire service, on any one date on or
after the date two (2) business days prior to the date set forth in the
Hearing Order for transmission of the Full Settlement Notice and
publication of the Summary Settlement Notice.
C. The Parties agree that
if, for any
reason, the Notice is not or cannot be first provided before February
1, 2006, the Parties will confer in good faith and recommend to the
Court that the date by which any Settlement Class Member must seek to
receive one or more of the Settlement Benefits (specified above in
Section VI.A(9)) be extended correspondingly.
D. The Parties also agree that, if the
Settlement
Benefits available to Settlement Class Members change, including by
operation of Section III.V. or IV.A, no new notice need issue to
Settlement Class Members.
VII. THE JUDGMENT
If, at or after the Fairness Hearing, the Settlement
Agreement
is approved by the Court, Plaintiffs shall promptly submit to the Court
the Judgment:
1. Ratifying the certification of the
Settlement
Class and approving the Settlement, judging its terms to be fair,
reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class
Members, directing its consummation in accordance with its terms, and
reserving continuing jurisdiction to implement, enforce, administer,
effectuate, interpret, monitor and ensure compliance with the
provisions of this Settlement Agreement and the Judgment;
2. Dismissing the Action
on the merits, with
prejudice and without costs (except as otherwise provided herein), and
releasing the Released Claims;
3. Permanently barring and
enjoining
Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members from asserting, commencing,
prosecuting, maintaining, or continuing (as members of a class action
or otherwise) any of the Released Claims;
4. Providing for Defendants' waivers of
the
limitation of liability provisions (Article 6 of each of the XCP EULA
and the MediaMax 5.0 EULA; Article 4.1 of the MediaMax 10 EULA), and
the New York forum selection clauses (Article 10 of each of the XCP
EULA and the MediaMax 5.0 EULA; Article 6.1 of the MediaMax 3.0 EULA)
of the EULAs, only to the extent that a person pursues non-Released
Claims against Defendants on an individual, as opposed to class action
or mass action, basis; and
5. Containing findings
based on the record
and confirmatory discovery obtained by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel that
the scope of the class and the releases are appropriate in light of
concerns that non-Released Claims for consequential damages to a
computer or network, as provided in Section 11.0, may raise questions
concerning the predominance and manageability requirements under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).
VIII. RELEASES
A. In accordance with the
provisions of the
Judgment, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, on the Effective Date, each Plaintiff and each
Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released,
relinquished and discharged each and all of the Released Claims against
each and all of the Released Parties, in the manner(s) set forth above.
B. In accordance with the
provisions of the
Judgment, for good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, on the Effective Date, the Defendants shall be
deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully,
finally and forever released, relinquished and discharged all of the
Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs' Class Counsel and all agents of and expert
witnesses retained by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel from any claims
(including Unknown Claims) for abuse of process, malicious prosecution
or any other claim arising out of, relating to, or in connection with
the institution, prosecution, assertion or resolution of the Action.
IX. ATTORNEYS'
FEES, COSTS AND INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS,
A. As of the date this Settlement
Agreement was
executed, the Parties have not substantially discussed either the
amount of attorneys' fees or costs that Plaintiffs' counsel may ask the
Court to award to them. It is, however, the understanding of the
Parties that Plaintiffs' counsel will apply for an award of attorneys'
fees and reimbursable expenses in accordance with legal principles,
that any fees and costs applied for and ultimately awarded by the Court
will be paid by Defendants, and that Defendants' payment of Plaintiffs'
attorneys' fees and reimbursable expenses will not affect the
Settlement Benefits provided to Settlement Class Members in any way.
B. The Parties will seek to reach
agreement on the
amount of attorneys' fees and reimbursable expenses to be applied for.
If the Parties reach agreement on the subject of fees and/or costs to
be awarded to Plaintiffs' counsel prior to the sending of notice to
Settlement Class Members, the Full Settlement Notice will reflect that
agreement.
C. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel will request
that the
Court award an incentive payment, not to exceed $1,000, to each of the
Plaintiffs in the Action and the named plaintiffs in the Non-S.D.N.Y.
Actions. Defendants shall not oppose any such requests, and will pay
$1,000 or such lesser amounts as the Court may direct to each of the
specified individuals within ten (10) business days after the Effective
Date.
X. COSTS OF NOTICE
AND ADMINISTRATION
A. SONY BMG agrees to disseminate the
Full Settlement
Notice and publish the Summary Settlement Notice, and to pay all costs
of doing so, in accordance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
In the event this Settlement Agreement does not become final or the
Effective Date does not occur for any reason, other than a breach by
Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs' Class Counsel of one or more provisions of
this Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs shall have no obligation to
reimburse Defendants for any costs or expenses paid, incurred or
obligated for notice of this Settlement to the Settlement Class.
B. SONY BMG agrees to be
responsible for
paying all costs incurred in connection with providing the Settlement
Benefits and otherwise complying with the procedures set forth in the
Judgment and this Settlement Agreement. All procedures followed to
provide the Notice to the Settlement Class shall be subject to approval
by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel and subject to review for completeness and
compliance with the Hearing Order by Plaintiffs' Class Counsel.
C. Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel will have the
right to monitor the fulfillment and payment of Settlement Benefits to
Settlement Class Members and, pursuant to the terms and conditions
included in this Settlement Agreement, may act on behalf of Settlement
Class Members to assist in their receipt of the Settlement Benefits.
SONY BMG shall cooperate in such effort consistent with the provisions
of this Settlement Agreement.
D. SONY BMG shall have the
responsibility to
prepare and provide the notices required by the Class Action Fairness
Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-2 (2005), including, but not limited to, the
notices to the United States Department of Justice and to the Attorneys
General of all states in which Settlement Class Members reside, as
specified in 28 U.S.C. § I715. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel shall
cooperate in the drafting of such notices and shall provide Defendants
with any and all information in its possession necessary for the
preparation of these notices.
XI. OTHER PROVISIONS
A. Upon execution of this
Settlement
Agreement, the Parties agree to cooperate and use all reasonable
efforts to achieve approval of the Settlement in accordance with the
terms of this Settlement Agreement, and to implement the Settlement and
comply with, confirm the bases for and effectuate the terms of this
Settlement Agreement.
B. Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel shall, upon
execution of an appropriate confidentiality agreement, be entitled to
appropriate confirmatory discovery from SONY BMG, F4I and SunnComm, as
specified in this Settlement Agreement or as may be agreed between the
Parties. Such confirmatory discovery shall occur between the
Preliminary Approval Date and the Fairness Hearing. Any confidential
documents given to Plaintiffs' Class Counsel during confirmatory
discovery shall be returned to Defendants prior to the Fairness
Hearing, or immediately upon termination of this Settlement Agreement
pursuant to its terms. Plaintiffs' Class Counsel's return of such
documents shall be without prejudice to its ability to demand document
production through party discovery if the Effective Date does not occur
and/or this Settlement Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms.
C. Whether the Effective
Date does or does
not occur, this Settlement Agreement, all negotiations and papers
related to it, and any proceedings in connection with the Settlement:
(1) are not and shall not be construed as evidence of an admission or
concession of wrongdoing or liability by Defendants or any other
Released Party as to any claim or allegation asserted in the Action and
the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions; and (2) are not and shall not be construed as
evidence or an admission or concession by Plaintiffs that claims or
allegations asserted in the Action and the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions against
Defendants or any other Released Party lack merit.
D. Plaintiffs and
Defendants agree that the
terms of this Settlement Agreement were not based solely on the amount
of consideration to be paid, but were based on (1) vigorous
arm's-length negotiations between counsel for the Parties; (2) the
assessment of the signatories to this Settlement Agreement of the
strengths and weaknesses of the various claims asserted in the Action
and the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions against Defendants, based on the various
claims asserted or which could be asserted; and (3) the expense and
risks of ongoing litigation. Moreover, the amount of damages that
Plaintiffs could prove is a matter of serious and genuine dispute, and
the terms of the Settlement do not constitute a finding, admission or
concession with respect to the measure of damages that could be proved
at trial. The Parties further acknowledge that no determination has
been made by the Court as to the amount, if any, of damages suffered by
Settlement Class Members or of the proper measure of any such damages,
and that the determination of damages, like the determination of
liability, is a complicated and uncertain process, typically involving
conflicting expert opinions.
E. At all times during the
course of this
litigation, Defendants have denied and continue to deny any liability
to Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members, and have denied and
continue to deny that Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Members were
damaged by any alleged wrongful conduct, or that, even if damaged, any
compensable damages could be measured or recovered.
F. In order to ensure that all
information provided
to the Settlement Class Members regarding the terms and conditions of
this Settlement is neutral in terms of content and consistent with what
has been submitted for approval of, or has been approved by, the Court,
Defendants and Plaintiffs' Class Counsel agree jointly to draft a press
release, subject to the approval of both Defendants and Plaintiffs'
Class Counsel, that describes this Settlement Agreement (including
Defendants' denial of liability and Plaintiffs' assertion that their
claims were meritorious) and includes substantially all the information
contained in the Summary Settlement Notice. The signatories to this
Settlement Agreement agree that they shall not issue or cause others to
issue any statements for publication or otherwise disseminate
statements regarding the terms and conditions of the Settlement that
are inconsistent with those included in this Settlement Agreement
and/or the joint press release. Notwithstanding the foregoing
agreement, Defendants retain their right to deny liability.
G. Within five (5)
business days after the
deadline established by the Court in the Hearing Order for members of
the Settlement Class to request exclusion from the Settlement Class,
Plaintiffs' Class Counsel shall furnish to Defendants' counsel a
complete list of all timely and valid requests for exclusion they have
received (the "Opt-Out List").
H. Defendants shall have
the option to
withdraw from this Settlement Agreement if the number of timely and
valid requests for exclusion exceeds one thousand. Defendants shall
have thirty (30) days from their receipt of the Opt-Out List in which
to exercise their right of withdrawal pursuant to this paragraph.
Withdrawal shall be accomplished by filing with the Court a notice of
withdrawal (the "Withdrawal Notice"), which notice shall, if Defendants
withdraw pursuant to this Section XI.H, be served on Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel.
I. This Settlement
Agreement is conditioned
upon the Judgment in the Action becoming Final. If the Judgment is
reversed or vacated, or if the Effective Date does not occur for any
other reason, the Defendants, and each of them, shall have the right to
terminate this Settlement Agreement with respect to such Defendant(s).
If the Judgment is modified in any manner that limits the scope of
releases given to the Released Parties as provided in Section VIII of
this Settlement Agreement, or does not include the findings identified
above in Section VII(5), or if the Hearing Order imposes obligations on
Defendants substantially different from those stated above in Section
V, each of Plaintiffs and Defendants shall separately have the right
either to affirm this Settlement Agreement as modified, or to terminate
this Settlement Agreement by filing and serving a Withdrawal Notice on
all the other non-withdrawing Parties.
J. The signatories to this
Settlement
Agreement agree to assist Defendants in seeking and obtaining the
dismissal of all other actions, including the Non-S.D.N.Y. Actions,
alleging Released Claims.
K. If the Effective Date
does not occur or
this Settlement Agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with
its provisions, the Parties shall be restored to their respective
positions as of December 22, 2005, except that any extensions of time
granted since that date by one Party to the other shall continue to
have force and effect, and neither Party shall seek an order of default
against any other Party for actions not taken while approval of the
Settlement was pending. The terms and provisions of the Settlement
Agreement shall at that time have no further force and effect with
respect to the Parties and, to the extent permitted by law, shall not
be used in any action or proceeding for any purpose. Any Judgment
entered in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement shall
be treated as vacated, nunc pro tune.
L. SunnComm and/or F4I may
withdraw from
this Settlement Agreement at any time before January 15, 2006 or the
date Notice is first disseminated, whichever is earlier, by filing and
serving a Withdrawal Notice to Plaintiffs' Class Counsel. If either
SunnComm and/or F4I so timely withdraws from this Settlement Agreement,
the remaining Parties shall request that the Court enter a Judgment
that excludes the withdrawing Defendant (and of each of its divisions
and direct and indirect subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, joint
ventures, predecessors and successor corporations and business
entities, and each and all of its past and present officers, directors,
servants, licensees, joint ventures, sureties, attorneys, agents,
consultants, advisors, contractors, employees, controlling or principal
shareholders, general or limited partners or partnerships, divisions,
insurers, designated management companies, and each and all of its
successors or predecessors in interest, assigns, or legal
representatives, all of which collectively and, with such withdrawing
Defendant, the "Withdrawing Defendant Parties") from the definition of
"Released Parties," the Withdrawing Defendant Parties shall be restored
to their position as of December 22, 2005, and Plaintiffs shall be
restored to their position in respect of the Withdrawing Defendant
Parties as of December 22, 2005.
M. The Parties agree that,
to the fullest
extent permitted by law, neither the Settlement Agreement nor the fact
of the Settlement, nor any act performed nor document executed pursuant
to or in furtherance of the Settlement Agreement or the Settlement, is
or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence
of: (I) the validity of any claim of any Settlement Class Member, or
(2) any wrongdoing, fault, omission, or liability of the Defendants in
any proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal.
Nothing in this Section XI.M shall preclude any Party from using the
Settlement Agreement, the Judgment, or any act performed or document
executed pursuant thereto in a proceeding to consummate, monitor or
enforce the Settlement Agreement, the terms of the Settlement or the
Judgment.
N. All of the Exhibits to
this Settlement Agreement are material and integral parts hereof.
O. The undersigned
signatories represent
that they are fully authorized to execute and enter into the terms and
conditions of this Settlement Agreement on behalf of the respective
persons or entities for whom they have signed this Settlement Agreement.
P. This Settlement
Agreement contains the
entire agreement among the Parties hereto and supersedes any prior
agreements or understandings between them. All terms of this Settlement
Agreement are contractual and not mere recitals and shall be construed
as if drafted by all Parties. All provisions of this Settlement
Agreement are and shall be binding upon each of the Parties hereto,
their agents, attorneys, employees, successors and assigns, and upon
all other persons claiming any interest in the subject matter hereto
through any of the Parties hereto, including Plaintiffs and any
Settlement Class Member who does not validly opt out of membership in
the Settlement Class.
Q. The Settlement Agreement may be
amended or
modified only by a written instrument signed by or on behalf of all
affected Parties or their successors-in-interest.
R. The Settlement
Agreement may be executed
in one or more counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them
shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. Counsel for the
Parties to the Settlement Agreement shall exchange among themselves
copies of the original signed counterparts, and a complete set of
original signed counterparts shall be filed with the Court.
S. The Parties agree that
the Court shall
have exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the Parties for all
purposes relating to the implementation, effectuation, interpretation,
administration, monitoring and enforcement of this Settlement Agreement
and all provisions thereof with respect to all Parties hereto and all
beneficiaries hereof, including all Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel, Defendants, Settlement Class Members and Released Parties.
Except as provided solely in this Section XI.S, F4I does not admit that
it has been personally served as required by law, or that this or any
court in the United States has jurisdiction over it, and that by
subjecting itself to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of
this Settlement Agreement, it does not accept or subject itself to
jurisdiction for any other action or matter. The Parties agree that the
Court also shall retain continuing jurisdiction to determine whether,
in the event an appeal is taken from any aspect of the Judgment
approving the Settlement or any award of attorneys' fees and/or costs,
notice should be given at the appellant's expense to some or all
Settlement Class Members apprising them of the pendency of the appeal
and such other matters as the Court may order. Any and all disputes,
requests or petitions regarding or arising out of the enforcement,
construction, administration or interpretation of the Settlement
Agreement, any provisions of the Settlement Agreement or the Judgment,
must be made, if at all, to this Court by motion to the Court.
T. The terms and
conditions of this
Settlement Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with, and governed by, the laws of the State of New York, without
regard to any applicable choice of law or conflicts rules.
DATED: December 28, 2005
KAMBER & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Scott A. Kamber, Esq (SK-5794) 19
19 Fulton Street, Suite 400
New York, NY 10038
(212) 571-2000
GIRARD, GIBBS & DE BARTOLOMEO LLP
Daniel C. Girard, Esq.
Elizabeth C. Pritzker, Esq.
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94108
(415) 981-4800
Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel and Interim Class Counsel
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT
Daniel M. Mandil, Esq., General Counsel
550 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 833-8000
Defendant
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
Bruce F. Keller, Esq.
Jeffrey S. Jacobson, Esq.
919 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 909-6000
Attorneys for Defendant SONY BMG Music Entertainment
THACHER, PROFFITT & WOOD LLP
Leonard T. Nuara, Esq.
25 DeForest Avenue
Summit, NJ 07901
(908) 598-5777
Attorneys for Defendant First4Internet Ltd.
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
Andrew C. DeVore, Esq.
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036
(212) 790-4535
Attorneys for Defendants SunnComm International Inc. and MediaMax Technology Corp.
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
Cindy A. Cohn, Esq.
Corynne McSherry, Esq.
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 436-9333
GREEN WELLING LLP
Robert S. Green, Esq.
Jenelle W. Welling, Esq.
595 Market Street, Suite 2750
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 477-6700
LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP
Jeffrey Friedman, Esq.
100 Pine Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 288-4545
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Tom and Yvonne Ricciuti, Mary Schumacher, Robert Hull, Joseph Halpin, and Edwin Bonner
|